What’s the cure for statist charity robbing? Retweet
We’ve just published a new Mental Lever mini-article. Remember, our Mental Levers are designed to teach libertarian thinking in bite-size chunks. You can use these Levers in a number of ways…
- Share them
- Forward them
- Link to them in online discussions.
This Mental Lever may even add a new phrase to your vocabulary. We reprint it below. But check out the Mental Lever on the Zero Aggression Project website. Click the title, and then…
- Use the slider on our website to VOTE. Make sure your opinion is heard.
- ENHANCE the conversation in the comments section.
By Perry Willis & Jim Babka
Key Concept: Statists engage in charity robbing.
Statists prefer aid programs that are paid for with violence-based funding (taxation). This robs your charities. The money grabbed from you cannot be used to support the voluntary sector causes you love.
The statist approach concentrates resources behind a single system of aid. This strangles innovation. Society loses the improvements we would normally gain from having competition between multiple strategies and institutions. Thus…
The statist approach is both greedy and harmful.
To stop “charity robbing” you must embrace the Zero Aggression Principle — Don’t threaten or initiate force, personally or politically.
Violence-based funding (taxation) must be replaced by voluntary funding. This one simple change would make state agencies compete with other charitable institutions. Things work better with competition.
–END of Mental Lever–
- Tell us what you think about this mini-article using our new voting slider!
- Please also consider sharing this article on Facebook or other social media. Remember, you can invite your friends to vote.
ZAP The State and have a nice day,
Perry Willis & Jim Babka
Co-creators, Zero Aggression Project