Pre-Header Tagline

You don't coerce or injure others. Why can politicians do it?

Zero Aggression Project’s 2018 accomplishments

With just $90k, we did all of this!

ZAP’s annual PROGRESS report: 3 victories, 18 new Levers, + new software Retweet

Traditionally, Downsize DC Foundation (not to be confused with our sister organization, DownsizeDC.org, Inc.) sends a January letter. It’s both an Annual Report and a Tax Receipt that goes to the people who’ve given during the year before.

This newsletter message is nearly identical to that letter, and we’re pleased to share it with you…

Thanks for your 2018 contributions to the Downsize DC Foundation, home of the Zero Aggression Project. We had two major achievements…

  1. Three amicus brief victories!
  2. Re-launched the PCT (Political Conscience Test) with a better UX (User eXperience).

Downsize DC Foundation (in partnership with DownsizeDC.org) filed eight briefs in 2018…

Jan. #FreeRoss Ulbricht/Silk Road (Sentence reduction or release, 4th & 6th Amendments)
Jan. NIFLA v Becerra (Opposing “compelled speech”)
Mar. U.S. v Ackerman (Do you own your emails?)
Apr. IFS v Becerra (Compelled donor disclosure by non-profits)
May Texas v U.S. (Repeal Obamacare)
May U.S. v Gundy (Overturn the administrative state, just like the Write the Laws Act)
Sept. U.S. v Zodhiates (The first test case for Carpenter)
Oct. AFPF v Becerra (Free press argument against non-profit donor disclosures)

We WON three cases. The Carpenter case is being called a “landmark.”

Carpenter was about vacuuming your individual location data from your cell phone. Prosecutors snag records from your phone provider without a warrant under the “third party” doctrine. The Chief Justice wrote a sweeping decision “beefing up” the privacy side of the Fourth Amendment. We loved Justice Gorsuch’s concurring dissent – a judicial tutorial, rebutting the State’s behavior on a property (instead of privacy) basis.

This result is especially gratifying because (in the last couple of years) we’ve filed THREE briefs attacking “third party doctrine.” Plus, it’s a likely landmark case! As one expert put it, “From now on, we’ll be talking about what the Fourth Amendment means in pre-Carpenter and post-Carpenter terms.”

We’ve filed many Fourth Amendment briefs over the years, including our landmark Jones decision. Another victory, Collins v. Virginia, involved whether cops can enter your yard, lift a tarp, and gather vehicle identification without a warrant. We made a property-based argument. There are two types of victories to report in this case!

  1. We filed two briefs in Collins, including the ONLY amicus brief requesting the Supreme Court actually hear the case.
  2. Even though Jones property-based tools were available, Justice Sotomayor went out of her way to expand privacy considerations even while ruling in favor of Collins! We’ll take the win.

Finally, we filed the ONLY amicus brief calling for the repeal of Obamacare in Texas v. U.S. The case has been expedited from the district-level to the Fifth Circuit Appeals Court. We intend to file further amicus briefs in this case.

Our sister organization, DownsizeDC.org, helps us raise money by announcing our case selections to their subscribers. Be sure you’re subscribed to their Downsizer-Dispatch.

Political Conscience Test Political Conscience Test

The PCT is a new Nolan Chart survey that asks 21st Century questions focused on the unique sales argument of libertarianism – Do you want to solve social problems with persuasion or aggression?

The PCT features a 0 to 100% answer scale that allows for nuance.

In our annual report last year, our stated Goal #1 was to dramatically increase the number of test takers. Goal #2 was to identify and recruit more of the people who scored libertarian. But the PCT’s UX was poor.

We made a major overhaul and relaunched in July. With a mere $1,700 invested in advertising, the PCT…

Attained more than 26,000 test takers (Goal #1). 45.7% scored libertarian plus 4.3% scored voluntaryist. We recruited 1,064 new subscribers (Goal #2).

We were pleased by these results. Then, in October, we met with a donor whose business spends more than $140,000 per year on this kind of advertising. And he said these results were “extraordinary.” But…

What would we do with these new recruits? We pressed “pause” on our outreach. First, we want to complete a redesign of our Zero Aggression site. And we expect to finish that in early-March. Then, we’ll press forward on an interactive tool called the Aggression Tracker. It’s more than 80% done.

PCT recruits will feed into Aggression Tracker. We’ll begin moving non-libertarians in a voluntaryist direction. Stay tuned to this Zero Aggression newsletter for details.

New content!

Our Mental Levers are mini-articles that present key libertarian ideas in bite-size chunks. We reported 73 Levers last year. The count reached 91 in 2018. Frankly, the pace will slow. We’ve nearly completed a “libertarian library” of thinking tools that can help people consistently arrive at the correct result, even while the politicians and media are dealing in incomplete or (what turns out to be) inaccurate facts.

We’ve already hinted at our 2019 focus.

As our partner organization DownsizeDC.org has pointed out…

No one has ever sought to pull these millions together into a single database. The result could be an activist’s dream! 100 tactics that currently seem hopeless might suddenly be empowered to achieve success.

The Zero Aggression Project’s role in this will be to move those libertarians in a voluntaryist direction.

We hope you like what we accomplished in 2018 and will consider expanding your support so we can achieve even more in 2019!

ZAP The State and have a nice day,

Jim Babka
Zero Aggression Project

By: Jim Babka

This entry was posted in Jim Babka and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. (No Comments)

Leave a reply