Pre-Header Tagline

You don't coerce or injure others. Why can politicians do it?
Zero Aggression is NOT Pacifism

Is the libertarian concept of Zero Aggression pacifist?

Zero Aggression permits defensive force.

Zero Aggression sounds pacifist. It isn’t. The Zero Aggression Principle only prohibits the initiation of force. Pacifism rejects both initiated force, and self-defense. Any idea that permits defensive force is automatically not pacifist.

Zero Aggression doesn’t even require zero assertiveness. You can compete hard in sports or business — just don’t attack people, or ask politicians to do that for you.

This means pacifists can still be libertarians; they simply can’t impose their dislike of defensive force on others. Of course, imposing anything on anyone would contradict the whole idea of pacifism, so there’s no concern there. In short…

Pacifists must be libertarians, to avoid contradiction, but libertarianism itself is not pacifist. To avoid confusion distinguish between initiated force and defensive force.

If these ideas attract you then please join us. Subscribe! And share this page with others.

By Perry Willis & Jim Babka

Join the Zero Aggression Project

Help us pursue our three-part mission to...  
1. Share the Zero Aggression Principle with every person on Earth.
 
2. Find and activate dormant libertarians so we can expand outreach.
 
3. Move everyone in a voluntaryist direction.
We always include an unsubscribe link.

Polling Slider

(23 Comments)

23 Responses to "Is the libertarian concept of Zero Aggression pacifist?"

Leave a reply