Pre-Header Tagline

You don't coerce or injure others. Why can politicians do it?

Do the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few?

Statists claim it’s okay for them to initiate force if doing so benefits more people than it harms. In other words, you, the individual, are too small to matter. Groups of individuals matter more. But this claim doesn’t stand up to close scrutiny…

Would you think it was good for The State to murder someone you love so their organs could be harvested to save other lives? After all, one heart, two kidneys, one liver, and assorted other body parts, would benefit vastly more lives than the one life lost.

The idea of harming a few to benefit many doesn’t work. Taken to its logical conclusion it creates a license for murder. And, in fact, the logic has been taken to that conclusion millions of times. The State has killed more people than all individual criminals combined.

By Perry Willis & Jim Babka

Polling Slider

(78 Comments)

78 Responses to "Do the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few?"

Leave a reply